SOS Allergo · I understand & manage
Recognise, record, investigate
Tree nut allergy
Hazelnut, walnut, cashew, pistachio and almond: document a reaction carefully to support diagnosis

A reaction after eating one tree nut does not necessarily mean an allergy to every tree nut. Diagnosis starts with a precise account of the reaction, followed by targeted tests. Identifying the exact responsible food helps avoid unnecessary restrictions while making genuinely risky foods safer.
In this sheet
3 essential points
‘Tree nuts’ do not represent a single allergen
In Europe, regulated labelling includes almond, hazelnut, walnut, cashew nut, pecan, Brazil nut, pistachio and macadamia nut. Peanut is not a tree nut: it is a legume.
After a reaction, keep the evidence
Exact product, ingredients, date, amount, delay before symptoms, and photos of the packaging and reaction directly inform the allergy assessment.
A positive test does not automatically mean an allergy
A positive skin prick test or specific IgE result first shows sensitisation. The result must always be considered alongside the clinical history.
Recognise and document a reaction
Which tree nuts should be specified?
- Tree nut
- Hazelnut
- Examples of forms to specify
- Whole, ground, chocolate spread, praline
- Tree nut
- Walnut
- Examples of forms to specify
- Whole, cake, salad, oil
- Tree nut
- Cashew nut
- Examples of forms to specify
- Whole, butter, Asian or plant-based cooking
- Tree nut
- Pistachio
- Examples of forms to specify
- Whole, ice cream, pastries, pesto
- Tree nut
- Almond
- Examples of forms to specify
- Whole, ground, frangipane, drink
- Tree nut
- Pecan / Brazil / macadamia
- Examples of forms to specify
- Mixes, pastries, chocolates
| Tree nut | Examples of forms to specify |
|---|---|
| Hazelnut | Whole, ground, chocolate spread, praline |
| Walnut | Whole, cake, salad, oil |
| Cashew nut | Whole, butter, Asian or plant-based cooking |
| Pistachio | Whole, ice cream, pastries, pesto |
| Almond | Whole, ground, frangipane, drink |
| Pecan / Brazil / macadamia | Mixes, pastries, chocolates |
What symptoms may occur?
- Area
- Mouth or throat
- Possible symptoms
- Itching, tingling, swelling of the lips
- Area
- Skin
- Possible symptoms
- Hives, redness, itching, angioedema
- Area
- Digestive system
- Possible symptoms
- Abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting
- Area
- Breathing
- Possible symptoms
- Cough, breathing difficulty, wheezing, change in voice
- Area
- Feeling faint
- Possible symptoms
- Weakness, dizziness, loss of consciousness
| Area | Possible symptoms |
|---|---|
| Mouth or throat | Itching, tingling, swelling of the lips |
| Skin | Hives, redness, itching, angioedema |
| Digestive system | Abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting |
| Breathing | Cough, breathing difficulty, wheezing, change in voice |
| Feeling faint | Weakness, dizziness, loss of consciousness |
Emergency
A precise record of the reaction
After a reaction, try to keep or record as much information as possible:
- Date and time of the reaction.
- Exact food or dish, brand and product name.
- Photo of the packaging and full ingredients list.
- Any ‘may contain’ statement.
- Recipe for home-made food or information from the restaurant.
- Identified tree nut or mixture; approximate amount.
- Raw, roasted, cooked, ground, paste or drink.
- Delay between eating and the first symptoms.
- Symptoms observed and photos if possible.
- Medicines given, any adrenaline, and emergency-department attendance.
Cross-reactions and foods already tolerated
Is a reaction limited to the mouth the same thing?
In someone allergic to birch pollen, antibodies directed against Bet v 1 may recognise similar proteins in certain foods, including Cor a 1 in hazelnut. This may cause pollen-food allergy syndrome, often involving itching or tingling of the lips, mouth or throat, particularly with the raw food.
This differs from primary hazelnut allergy directed against certain storage proteins such as Cor a 9 or Cor a 14, which are more associated with systemic reactions. Molecular tests help explain the profile but can never, on their own, predict exactly how severe a future reaction will be.
Which cross-allergies should be known?
- Association
- Cashew ↔ pistachio
- What is known
- Particularly strong cross-reactivity
- Association
- Walnut ↔ pecan
- What is known
- Particularly strong cross-reactivity
- Association
- Hazelnut ↔ birch
- What is known
- Common pollen-food allergy syndrome involving PR-10 proteins
- Association
- Some tree nuts ↔ peach / plants
- What is known
- Possible cross-reactivity involving LTPs in some patients
- Association
- Tree nuts ↔ peanut
- What is known
- Co-allergy is possible, but peanut is not a tree nut
- Association
- Tree nuts ↔ sesame
- What is known
- An association is possible, without an automatic allergy
| Association | What is known |
|---|---|
| Cashew ↔ pistachio | Particularly strong cross-reactivity |
| Walnut ↔ pecan | Particularly strong cross-reactivity |
| Hazelnut ↔ birch | Common pollen-food allergy syndrome involving PR-10 proteins |
| Some tree nuts ↔ peach / plants | Possible cross-reactivity involving LTPs in some patients |
| Tree nuts ↔ peanut | Co-allergy is possible, but peanut is not a tree nut |
| Tree nuts ↔ sesame | An association is possible, without an automatic allergy |
What you eat without a problem also matters
Saying ‘I regularly eat almonds and hazelnuts without any problem’ is valuable information. A confirmed cashew-nut allergy does not mean that every other tree nut already eaten without a reaction must automatically be removed.
What happens during allergy assessment?
Step 1 — The history
The allergist reconstructs: food → amount → delay → symptoms → treatment → outcome.
- Tree nuts already tolerated.
- Peanut and, where relevant, sesame.
- Pollen allergy, particularly birch.
- Previous reactions and asthma.
- Possible cofactors.
Step 2 — Skin prick tests
These may be performed using allergen extracts and, depending on the situation and centre's practice, with the food itself. A positive test indicates sensitisation and must always be interpreted alongside the clinical history.
Step 3 — Specific IgE
Testing is targeted at the tree nut or nuts actually suspected. A large panel that ignores the history may identify sensitisation without clinical significance and needlessly complicate the diagnosis.
What about molecular IgE tests?
- Food
- Hazelnut
- Particularly useful molecule
- Cor a 14, sometimes Cor a 9
- Relevance
- Points towards primary hazelnut allergy
- Food
- Cashew nut
- Particularly useful molecule
- Ana o 3
- Relevance
- A particularly effective diagnostic marker
- Food
- Walnut
- Particularly useful molecule
- Jug r 1
- Relevance
- May help confirm the diagnosis depending on the context
- Food
- Hazelnut + birch
- Particularly useful molecule
- Cor a 1
- Relevance
- Points more towards pollen-food cross-reactivity
| Food | Particularly useful molecule | Relevance |
|---|---|---|
| Hazelnut | Cor a 14, sometimes Cor a 9 | Points towards primary hazelnut allergy |
| Cashew nut | Ana o 3 | A particularly effective diagnostic marker |
| Walnut | Jug r 1 | May help confirm the diagnosis depending on the context |
| Hazelnut + birch | Cor a 1 | Points more towards pollen-food cross-reactivity |
Oral food challenge (OFC)
An OFC is performed under medical supervision with gradually increasing doses. It may be used to confirm or exclude an allergy when assessment remains uncertain, check that a tree nut is genuinely tolerated, avoid unnecessary avoidance or reassess an allergy over time.
Why not avoid everything as a precaution?
Modern strategies seek to individualise avoidance. The aim is to make genuinely risky foods safe while avoiding unjustified dietary restrictions, particularly in children.
After diagnosis
What happens when an allergy is confirmed?
- Avoid the responsible tree nut.
- Dietary advice and label reading.
- A written action plan.
- Treatment of accidental reactions.
- An adrenaline auto-injector when indicated.
- Education for the patient and those around them.
- Dietetic advice when several foods are avoided, especially in children.
Reading a label
In Europe, regulated tree nuts must be clearly declared when used as ingredients. Peanut is declared separately.
- Statement
- ‘Contains hazelnut’
- Meaning
- Hazelnut is an ingredient in the product
- Statement
- ‘May contain traces of hazelnut’
- Meaning
- Precautionary labelling linked to a risk of accidental presence
| Statement | Meaning |
|---|---|
| ‘Contains hazelnut’ | Hazelnut is an ingredient in the product |
| ‘May contain traces of hazelnut’ | Precautionary labelling linked to a risk of accidental presence |
How to manage ‘trace’ statements should be individualised with the allergist rather than turned into a universal rule.
Common misconceptions
- Misconception
- ‘One nut means all nuts’
- SOS Allergo response
- Not necessarily.
- Misconception
- ‘Peanut is a tree nut’
- SOS Allergo response
- No: it is a legume.
- Misconception
- ‘My IgE is positive, so I am allergic’
- SOS Allergo response
- No: it first shows sensitisation.
- Misconception
- ‘My results are positive for five nuts, so I am allergic to all five’
- SOS Allergo response
- Not automatically.
- Misconception
- ‘I can test an uncertain nut at home’
- SOS Allergo response
- No: the allergist decides whether a medically supervised OFC is needed.
| Misconception | SOS Allergo response |
|---|---|
| ‘One nut means all nuts’ | Not necessarily. |
| ‘Peanut is a tree nut’ | No: it is a legume. |
| ‘My IgE is positive, so I am allergic’ | No: it first shows sensitisation. |
| ‘My results are positive for five nuts, so I am allergic to all five’ | Not automatically. |
| ‘I can test an uncertain nut at home’ | No: the allergist decides whether a medically supervised OFC is needed. |
Before your appointment: the SOS Allergo checklist
- Packaging or a photo of the product.
- Ingredients list.
- Brand and product reference.
- Date and time of the reaction.
- Amount eaten.
- Delay before symptoms.
- Photos of hives or swelling.
- Tree nuts eaten without a problem.
Download the validated French sheet
The complete patient sheet is currently available as a French PDF.
You may also want to read
Main references
- Santos AF, et al. EAACI guidelines on the diagnosis of IgE-mediated food allergy. Allergy. 2023;78:3057-3076.
- Santos AF, et al. EAACI guidelines on the management of IgE-mediated food allergy. Allergy. 2025;80:14-36.
- Sampson HA, et al. AAAAI-EAACI PRACTALL: Standardizing oral food challenges - 2024 Update. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2024;35:e14276.
- Pastor-Vargas C, et al. Current options in the management of tree nut allergy: systematic review and narrative synthesis. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2024;35:e14132.
- Règlement (UE) n°1169/2011, annexe II – information des consommateurs sur les denrées alimentaires.
This information sheet does not replace assessment, an emergency plan or personalised advice from your allergist.
Scientific review: September 2026 · sosallergo.fr