Skip to main content

SOS Allergo

Loading search…

SOS Allergo · I understand & manage

Food & digestive allergies

Recognise, record, investigate

Tree nut allergy

Hazelnut, walnut, cashew, pistachio and almond: document a reaction carefully to support diagnosis

A reaction after eating one tree nut does not necessarily mean an allergy to every tree nut. Diagnosis starts with a precise account of the reaction, followed by targeted tests. Identifying the exact responsible food helps avoid unnecessary restrictions while making genuinely risky foods safer.

In this sheet

3 essential points

  1. ‘Tree nuts’ do not represent a single allergen

    In Europe, regulated labelling includes almond, hazelnut, walnut, cashew nut, pecan, Brazil nut, pistachio and macadamia nut. Peanut is not a tree nut: it is a legume.

  2. After a reaction, keep the evidence

    Exact product, ingredients, date, amount, delay before symptoms, and photos of the packaging and reaction directly inform the allergy assessment.

  3. A positive test does not automatically mean an allergy

    A positive skin prick test or specific IgE result first shows sensitisation. The result must always be considered alongside the clinical history.

Recognise and document a reaction

Which tree nuts should be specified?

Tree nut
Hazelnut
Examples of forms to specify
Whole, ground, chocolate spread, praline
Tree nut
Walnut
Examples of forms to specify
Whole, cake, salad, oil
Tree nut
Cashew nut
Examples of forms to specify
Whole, butter, Asian or plant-based cooking
Tree nut
Pistachio
Examples of forms to specify
Whole, ice cream, pastries, pesto
Tree nut
Almond
Examples of forms to specify
Whole, ground, frangipane, drink
Tree nut
Pecan / Brazil / macadamia
Examples of forms to specify
Mixes, pastries, chocolates

What symptoms may occur?

Area
Mouth or throat
Possible symptoms
Itching, tingling, swelling of the lips
Area
Skin
Possible symptoms
Hives, redness, itching, angioedema
Area
Digestive system
Possible symptoms
Abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting
Area
Breathing
Possible symptoms
Cough, breathing difficulty, wheezing, change in voice
Area
Feeling faint
Possible symptoms
Weakness, dizziness, loss of consciousness

A precise record of the reaction

After a reaction, try to keep or record as much information as possible:

  • Date and time of the reaction.
  • Exact food or dish, brand and product name.
  • Photo of the packaging and full ingredients list.
  • Any ‘may contain’ statement.
  • Recipe for home-made food or information from the restaurant.
  • Identified tree nut or mixture; approximate amount.
  • Raw, roasted, cooked, ground, paste or drink.
  • Delay between eating and the first symptoms.
  • Symptoms observed and photos if possible.
  • Medicines given, any adrenaline, and emergency-department attendance.

Cross-reactions and foods already tolerated

Is a reaction limited to the mouth the same thing?

In someone allergic to birch pollen, antibodies directed against Bet v 1 may recognise similar proteins in certain foods, including Cor a 1 in hazelnut. This may cause pollen-food allergy syndrome, often involving itching or tingling of the lips, mouth or throat, particularly with the raw food.

This differs from primary hazelnut allergy directed against certain storage proteins such as Cor a 9 or Cor a 14, which are more associated with systemic reactions. Molecular tests help explain the profile but can never, on their own, predict exactly how severe a future reaction will be.

Which cross-allergies should be known?

Association
Cashew ↔ pistachio
What is known
Particularly strong cross-reactivity
Association
Walnut ↔ pecan
What is known
Particularly strong cross-reactivity
Association
Hazelnut ↔ birch
What is known
Common pollen-food allergy syndrome involving PR-10 proteins
Association
Some tree nuts ↔ peach / plants
What is known
Possible cross-reactivity involving LTPs in some patients
Association
Tree nuts ↔ peanut
What is known
Co-allergy is possible, but peanut is not a tree nut
Association
Tree nuts ↔ sesame
What is known
An association is possible, without an automatic allergy

What you eat without a problem also matters

Saying ‘I regularly eat almonds and hazelnuts without any problem’ is valuable information. A confirmed cashew-nut allergy does not mean that every other tree nut already eaten without a reaction must automatically be removed.

What happens during allergy assessment?

Step 1 — The history

The allergist reconstructs: food → amount → delay → symptoms → treatment → outcome.

  • Tree nuts already tolerated.
  • Peanut and, where relevant, sesame.
  • Pollen allergy, particularly birch.
  • Previous reactions and asthma.
  • Possible cofactors.

Step 2 — Skin prick tests

These may be performed using allergen extracts and, depending on the situation and centre's practice, with the food itself. A positive test indicates sensitisation and must always be interpreted alongside the clinical history.

Step 3 — Specific IgE

Testing is targeted at the tree nut or nuts actually suspected. A large panel that ignores the history may identify sensitisation without clinical significance and needlessly complicate the diagnosis.

What about molecular IgE tests?

Food
Hazelnut
Particularly useful molecule
Cor a 14, sometimes Cor a 9
Relevance
Points towards primary hazelnut allergy
Food
Cashew nut
Particularly useful molecule
Ana o 3
Relevance
A particularly effective diagnostic marker
Food
Walnut
Particularly useful molecule
Jug r 1
Relevance
May help confirm the diagnosis depending on the context
Food
Hazelnut + birch
Particularly useful molecule
Cor a 1
Relevance
Points more towards pollen-food cross-reactivity

Oral food challenge (OFC)

An OFC is performed under medical supervision with gradually increasing doses. It may be used to confirm or exclude an allergy when assessment remains uncertain, check that a tree nut is genuinely tolerated, avoid unnecessary avoidance or reassess an allergy over time.

Why not avoid everything as a precaution?

Modern strategies seek to individualise avoidance. The aim is to make genuinely risky foods safe while avoiding unjustified dietary restrictions, particularly in children.

After diagnosis

What happens when an allergy is confirmed?

  • Avoid the responsible tree nut.
  • Dietary advice and label reading.
  • A written action plan.
  • Treatment of accidental reactions.
  • An adrenaline auto-injector when indicated.
  • Education for the patient and those around them.
  • Dietetic advice when several foods are avoided, especially in children.

Reading a label

In Europe, regulated tree nuts must be clearly declared when used as ingredients. Peanut is declared separately.

Statement
‘Contains hazelnut’
Meaning
Hazelnut is an ingredient in the product
Statement
‘May contain traces of hazelnut’
Meaning
Precautionary labelling linked to a risk of accidental presence

How to manage ‘trace’ statements should be individualised with the allergist rather than turned into a universal rule.

Common misconceptions

Misconception
‘One nut means all nuts’
SOS Allergo response
Not necessarily.
Misconception
‘Peanut is a tree nut’
SOS Allergo response
No: it is a legume.
Misconception
‘My IgE is positive, so I am allergic’
SOS Allergo response
No: it first shows sensitisation.
Misconception
‘My results are positive for five nuts, so I am allergic to all five’
SOS Allergo response
Not automatically.
Misconception
‘I can test an uncertain nut at home’
SOS Allergo response
No: the allergist decides whether a medically supervised OFC is needed.

Before your appointment: the SOS Allergo checklist

  • Packaging or a photo of the product.
  • Ingredients list.
  • Brand and product reference.
  • Date and time of the reaction.
  • Amount eaten.
  • Delay before symptoms.
  • Photos of hives or swelling.
  • Tree nuts eaten without a problem.

Download the validated French sheet

The complete patient sheet is currently available as a French PDF.

Main references
  1. Santos AF, et al. EAACI guidelines on the diagnosis of IgE-mediated food allergy. Allergy. 2023;78:3057-3076.
  2. Santos AF, et al. EAACI guidelines on the management of IgE-mediated food allergy. Allergy. 2025;80:14-36.
  3. Sampson HA, et al. AAAAI-EAACI PRACTALL: Standardizing oral food challenges - 2024 Update. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2024;35:e14276.
  4. Pastor-Vargas C, et al. Current options in the management of tree nut allergy: systematic review and narrative synthesis. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2024;35:e14132.
  5. Règlement (UE) n°1169/2011, annexe II – information des consommateurs sur les denrées alimentaires.

This information sheet does not replace assessment, an emergency plan or personalised advice from your allergist.

Scientific review: September 2026 · sosallergo.fr