SOS Allergo · I understand & manage
Reaction, cross-allergies and allergy assessment
Peanut allergy
Recognise, record and investigate

Peanut is a legume, not a tree nut. Peanut allergy can cause reactions ranging from limited symptoms to anaphylaxis. Diagnosis relies on a detailed history of the reaction and targeted tests. Sensitisation to peanut or other legumes does not automatically mean allergy to all these foods.
In this sheet
3 essential points
Peanut is not a tree nut
Peanut belongs to the legume family, like soy, peas, lentils, chickpeas, beans, lupin and broad beans. Peanut allergy does not mean allergy to every legume.
After a reaction, keep the evidence
Exact product, ingredients, date, amount, delay before symptoms, photographs of the packaging and reaction: this information directly guides the allergy assessment.
A positive test does not automatically mean allergy
A positive skin prick test or IgE result first indicates sensitisation. The diagnosis must always be considered alongside the clinical history.
Recognising and documenting a reaction
Where might peanut be found?
- Situation
- Whole peanuts
- Examples
- Roasted peanuts, snacks
- Situation
- Spread / paste
- Examples
- Peanut butter or paste
- Situation
- Cakes / confectionery
- Examples
- Chocolate, biscuits, bars
- Situation
- Asian or African cuisine
- Examples
- Sauces, satay, peanut-based dishes
- Situation
- Snacks / mixes
- Examples
- Snack mixes, granola
- Situation
- Processed products
- Examples
- Peanut flour, powder or paste in a recipe
| Situation | Examples |
|---|---|
| Whole peanuts | Roasted peanuts, snacks |
| Spread / paste | Peanut butter or paste |
| Cakes / confectionery | Chocolate, biscuits, bars |
| Asian or African cuisine | Sauces, satay, peanut-based dishes |
| Snacks / mixes | Snack mixes, granola |
| Processed products | Peanut flour, powder or paste in a recipe |
Which symptoms may occur?
- Area
- Mouth / throat
- Possible symptoms
- Tingling, itching, swelling of the lips
- Area
- Skin
- Possible symptoms
- Hives, redness, itching, angioedema
- Area
- Digestive system
- Possible symptoms
- Abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting
- Area
- Respiratory system
- Possible symptoms
- Cough, wheezing, difficulty breathing, voice change
- Area
- Cardiovascular / neurological
- Possible symptoms
- Feeling faint, weakness, dizziness, loss of consciousness
- Area
- Several organ systems
- Possible symptoms
- May represent anaphylaxis
| Area | Possible symptoms |
|---|---|
| Mouth / throat | Tingling, itching, swelling of the lips |
| Skin | Hives, redness, itching, angioedema |
| Digestive system | Abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting |
| Respiratory system | Cough, wheezing, difficulty breathing, voice change |
| Cardiovascular / neurological | Feeling faint, weakness, dizziness, loss of consciousness |
| Several organ systems | May represent anaphylaxis |
Emergency: follow your action plan
Cross-allergies and co-allergies
Why can tests be positive to several legumes?
Legumes share certain protein families. IgE cross-reactivity may therefore occur between peanut, lupin, soy, peas, lentils, chickpeas, beans or broad beans. However, laboratory cross-reactivity does not mean that a clinical reaction to the food will occur systematically.
Peanut and lupin: an association to know
Lupin is used particularly as flour or protein in some bakery products, cakes and plant-based foods. True peanut-lupin cross-allergy is well documented and severe reactions are possible.
Peanut and soy
Peanut and soy are both legumes, and some of their proteins may be recognised by the same IgE. However, laboratory sensitisation to soy in a person with peanut allergy does not automatically mean clinical soy allergy.
What about other legumes?
- Legume
- Lupin
- Key point
- Cross-reaction with peanut is particularly well documented
- Legume
- Soy
- Key point
- Cross-sensitisation is possible; clinical allergy is not systematic
- Legume
- Peas
- Key point
- Allergy is possible; pea proteins are increasingly used
- Legume
- Lentils
- Key point
- Allergy is possible, particularly in Mediterranean regions
- Legume
- Chickpeas
- Key point
- May be associated with allergy to other legumes
- Legume
- Beans / broad beans
- Key point
- Reactions are possible but much less systematic
| Legume | Key point |
|---|---|
| Lupin | Cross-reaction with peanut is particularly well documented |
| Soy | Cross-sensitisation is possible; clinical allergy is not systematic |
| Peas | Allergy is possible; pea proteins are increasingly used |
| Lentils | Allergy is possible, particularly in Mediterranean regions |
| Chickpeas | May be associated with allergy to other legumes |
| Beans / broad beans | Reactions are possible but much less systematic |
What about tree nuts?
Peanut ≠ tree nut. People with peanut allergy may also have an independent allergy to one or more tree nuts, but this is not automatic. A tree nut that is already eaten regularly without a reaction should not be removed solely because peanut allergy has been diagnosed.
Peanut and birch pollen: Ara h 8
In some patients with birch pollen allergy, IgE directed against Bet v 1 recognises the related peanut protein Ara h 8. This may be associated with pollen-food allergy syndrome, mainly causing itching or tingling in the mouth and lips. This profile must be interpreted alongside the clinical history.
How is the allergy assessment performed?
Step 1 — Medical history
The allergist reconstructs: food → amount → timing → symptoms → treatment → outcome.
- Legumes already tolerated.
- Tree nuts already tolerated.
- Any reactions to lupin or soy.
- Pollen allergy, particularly to birch.
- Asthma, previous reactions and any cofactors.
Step 2 — Skin prick tests and specific IgE
After taking a targeted clinical history, the allergist may offer skin prick tests and/or specific IgE testing. Their results are useful but must never be interpreted in isolation.
Step 3 — Molecular allergology
- Molecule
- Ara h 2
- What it can add
- A particularly useful marker for confirming true peanut allergy
- Molecule
- Ara h 6
- What it can add
- A profile similar to Ara h 2; may supplement some assessments
- Molecule
- Ara h 1 / Ara h 3
- What it can add
- Storage proteins that provide additional information
- Molecule
- Ara h 8
- What it can add
- Often associated with birch / pollen-food allergy syndrome
- Molecule
- Ara h 9
- What it can add
- LTP; may be relevant in some Mediterranean populations
| Molecule | What it can add |
|---|---|
| Ara h 2 | A particularly useful marker for confirming true peanut allergy |
| Ara h 6 | A profile similar to Ara h 2; may supplement some assessments |
| Ara h 1 / Ara h 3 | Storage proteins that provide additional information |
| Ara h 8 | Often associated with birch / pollen-food allergy syndrome |
| Ara h 9 | LTP; may be relevant in some Mediterranean populations |
Step 4 — BAT in some centres
When the diagnosis remains uncertain despite skin prick tests and IgE testing, a basophil activation test (BAT) may be offered in some specialist centres where this technique is available.
Oral food challenge (OFC)
An oral food challenge (OFC) involves gradually giving the food under medical supervision. It may confirm or rule out an allergy, reassess an allergy over time or avoid unnecessary exclusion.
Why document the reaction precisely?
A photograph of the packaging, ingredients, date, amount, delay and symptoms may avoid unnecessary tests or help select the most relevant investigations. Also record any cofactors: exercise, alcohol, NSAIDs, infection or unusual circumstances.
After diagnosis
What should be done when peanut allergy is confirmed?
- Targeted avoidance of peanut.
- Reading labels.
- A written action plan.
- Treatment of accidental reactions.
- An adrenaline auto-injector if indicated.
- Education for the patient and those around them.
- Dietetic support if needed.
- Continuing tolerated foods following medical advice.
Reading labels
In Europe, peanut, soy and lupin are among the allergens whose presence as an ingredient must be clearly declared. They are listed as three separate categories. Decisions about ‘may contain’ statements must be individualised with the allergy team.
- Statement
- ‘Contains peanut’
- Meaning
- Peanut is an ingredient in the product
- Statement
- ‘May contain peanut’
- Meaning
- A precautionary statement about possible accidental presence
| Statement | Meaning |
|---|---|
| ‘Contains peanut’ | Peanut is an ingredient in the product |
| ‘May contain peanut’ | A precautionary statement about possible accidental presence |
Is oral immunotherapy a treatment option?
Peanut oral immunotherapy may be discussed for some children and adolescents in a specialist setting. Its main aim is to increase the reaction threshold and reduce risk from accidental exposure. It does not mean that the allergy has disappeared and does not replace emergency measures.
Common misconceptions
- Misconception
- ‘Peanut is a nut.’
- Key point
- No: it is a legume.
- Misconception
- ‘Peanut allergy means avoiding all legumes.’
- Key point
- False.
- Misconception
- ‘A positive soy test means stopping soy.’
- Key point
- Not necessarily: clinical relevance must be checked.
- Misconception
- ‘Peanut means allergy to every tree nut.’
- Key point
- No: co-allergy is possible but not automatic.
- Misconception
- ‘A high Ara h 2 predicts future severity.’
- Key point
- No: it mainly helps diagnosis.
- Misconception
- ‘I can test a food I have never eaten at home.’
- Key point
- No, if the risk is uncertain.
| Misconception | Key point |
|---|---|
| ‘Peanut is a nut.’ | No: it is a legume. |
| ‘Peanut allergy means avoiding all legumes.’ | False. |
| ‘A positive soy test means stopping soy.’ | Not necessarily: clinical relevance must be checked. |
| ‘Peanut means allergy to every tree nut.’ | No: co-allergy is possible but not automatic. |
| ‘A high Ara h 2 predicts future severity.’ | No: it mainly helps diagnosis. |
| ‘I can test a food I have never eaten at home.’ | No, if the risk is uncertain. |
Before your appointment: the SOS Allergo checklist
- Packaging or a photograph of the product.
- Full ingredients, brand and product reference.
- Date and time of the reaction, amount eaten and delay before symptoms.
- Photographs of symptoms and the emergency department report.
- List of tolerated legumes and tree nuts.
Download the validated sheet
The complete validated patient PDF is currently available in French.
You may also want to read
Main references
- Santos AF, et al. EAACI diagnosis guideline. Allergy. 2023;78:3057-3076.
- Santos AF, et al. EAACI management guideline. Allergy. 2025;80:14-36.
- Abu Risha M, et al. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2024;24:527-548.
- Chan ES, et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019.
- Règlement (UE) n°1169/2011, annexe II.
This information sheet does not replace your allergist's assessment, emergency plan or personalised instructions.
Scientific review: September 2026 · sosallergo.fr