Skip to main content

SOS Allergo

Loading search…

SOS Allergo · I understand & manage

Allergens & environment

Bakery and pastry work: occupational respiratory allergies and dermatitis

Flour, enzymes, hands, nose and airways: identify the link with work early

In bakery and pastry work, flour dust, enzymes and other ingredients may cause rhinitis, asthma, hives or protein contact dermatitis. Hand eczema may also be irritant or result from delayed contact allergy. Identifying the mechanism helps select the right tests and preventive measures.

Dans cette fiche

Three essential points

  1. 1. Flour plus nose or airway symptoms are not necessarily simple irritation

    Sneezing, a blocked or runny nose, cough, wheezing or breathlessness occurring at work should prompt investigation for work-related rhinitis or asthma. Improvement on days off or during holidays is an important clue.

  2. 2. Hand eczema may have several mechanisms

    Irritant dermatitis, delayed contact allergy, contact hives and protein contact dermatitis may look similar. The clinical history and choice of tests are essential.

  3. 3. Patch tests and skin prick tests do not investigate the same process

    Patch tests mainly investigate delayed allergy. Skin prick or prick-to-prick tests look for immediate sensitisation, particularly to flour and other proteins. Patch tests may be negative in protein contact dermatitis.

Why does bakery work involve so much exposure?

Situation
Weighing / opening bags
Possible exposure
Clouds of flour and powdered mixes.
Situation
Filling the mixer / kneading
Possible exposure
Flour becoming airborne again.
Situation
Dusting / shaping
Possible exposure
Flour dust close to the airways.
Situation
Cleaning
Possible exposure
Dust becoming airborne again when dry sweeping or using compressed air.
Situation
Pastry / viennoiserie
Possible exposure
Egg, milk, soy, lupin, seeds, tree nuts and other proteins depending on recipes.
Situation
Improvers
Possible exposure
Baking enzymes, particularly fungal alpha-amylase.

The main allergens to know

Family
Cereals
Examples / message
Wheat, rye, barley, oats and maize; depending on recipes: buckwheat, soy and lupin.
Family
Enzymes
Examples / message
Mainly fungal alpha-amylase; other enzymes depending on the improvers used.
Family
Other food proteins
Examples / message
Egg, milk, sesame or other seeds, tree nuts, yeast and other ingredients actually handled.

Occupational asthma or work-exacerbated asthma?

Situation
Occupational asthma
What to understand
Work caused the asthma to develop through sensitisation or occupational exposure.
Situation
Work-exacerbated asthma
What to understand
The asthma already existed, but dust, flour, irritants, heat or physical effort at work make it worse.

Work and rest pattern: a major clue

How is a suspected respiratory condition investigated?

Test
Spirometry / pulmonary function tests (PFTs)
What it provides
Look for airflow obstruction and variability; FEV1 is measured by spirometry.
Test
Skin prick tests
What it provides
May identify immediate sensitisation to the flour actually handled and, depending on the context, to certain enzymes or other proteins.
Test
Specific IgE
What it provides
May help for wheat, rye, alpha-amylase and other allergens available through the laboratory.
Test
Peak-flow diary (PEF)
What it provides
When prescribed and medically interpreted, this may document differences between periods at work and away from work.
Test
Specialist investigations
What it provides
Bronchial hyperresponsiveness testing or specific challenge testing in some centres, when required.

A peak-flow diary: useful in some situations

Peak flow measures PEF (peak expiratory flow), not FEV1. Under medical supervision, repeated measurements several times a day during periods at and away from work may help document the effect of work.

The occupational physician: essential

Do not leave your occupation solely because of a positive test. The occupational physician can assess the workstation, identify the highest-exposure tasks, review formulations and safety data sheets, suggest adjustments and help support continued employment.

Four hand conditions to distinguish

Problem
Irritant dermatitis
Typical appearance
Dryness, cracks, burning and redness.
Most useful investigation
History, examination and exposure assessment.
Problem
Allergic contact dermatitis
Typical appearance
Delayed eczema after sensitisation.
Most useful investigation
Patch tests.
Problem
Contact hives
Typical appearance
Rapid wheals or swelling after contact.
Most useful investigation
Skin prick / prick-to-prick testing depending on the context.
Problem
Protein contact dermatitis
Typical appearance
Chronic hand eczema with rapid flares after protein contact.
Most useful investigation
Skin prick / prick-to-prick testing; patch tests may be negative.

Protein contact dermatitis: do not miss it

This resembles chronic hand eczema, but contact with the responsible protein may rapidly cause itching, redness, hives or small blisters. Food-handling occupations are particularly affected. Flour and cereals, as well as egg, milk, some seeds or enzymes, may be involved depending on the tasks performed.

Which skin tests?

Test type
Patch tests
When should it be considered?
Suspected delayed contact allergy: European baseline series (EBS) plus an occupational series suited to food-handling work, then products actually used when relevant.
Test type
Skin prick / prick-to-prick tests
When should it be considered?
Suspected contact hives or protein contact dermatitis: flour and proteins actually handled, guided by the clinical history.
Test type
Workstation / safety data sheet assessment
When should it be considered?
Essential for determining what flour, mixes, improvers, disinfectants and gloves actually contain.

Before the consultation: bring what really helps

List and photographs of flour bags · brands and references of mixes · composition of improvers and enzymes · seeds and powders used · cleaning and disinfection products · glove type · safety data sheets if available · photographs of lesions · previous PFTs · timing and delay of symptoms.

Prevention: reduce dust first

  • Reduce dust emissions at source: use gentle handling, enclosed or covered systems and local exhaust ventilation where available.
  • Put water into the mixer before flour and place flour close to the bottom instead of throwing it in from a height.
  • Limit flour dusting and choose less dusty techniques or products where possible.
  • Clean with a suitable vacuum; avoid dry sweeping and compressed air, which make flour airborne again.
  • For the hands: reduce wet work, use gloves suited to the task and protect the skin barrier regularly.

Recognition and compensation as an occupational disease

Situation
Occupational rhinitis / asthma
French framework
French occupational disease table RG 66 includes, in particular, aerosolised proteins and work involving exposure to flour; the diagnosis and criteria must be documented.
Situation
Allergic contact dermatitis
French framework
French table RG 65 may apply depending on the allergen and recognition criteria.
Situation
Conditions related to certain enzymes
French framework
French table RG 63 may apply in some situations.
Situation
Process
French framework
The doctor issues the initial medical certificate and the claim is sent to the French local Health Insurance Fund (CPAM). The occupational physician or an occupational disease clinic can help identify the appropriate framework.

Common myths

Myth
‘Flour only causes irritation.’
SOS Allergo message
False: it may also cause genuine IgE sensitisation.
Myth
‘A positive wheat skin prick test proves occupational asthma.’
SOS Allergo message
No: sensitisation and occupational disease are different.
Myth
‘Negative patch tests mean no skin allergy.’
SOS Allergo message
False, particularly for protein contact dermatitis.
Myth
‘My asthma existed before, so work cannot be involved.’
SOS Allergo message
False: asthma may be exacerbated by work.
Myth
‘Peak flow measures my FEV1.’
SOS Allergo message
No: it measures PEF.
Myth
‘If it is occupational, I must stop immediately.’
SOS Allergo message
Not automatically: diagnosis, prevention and continued employment should be discussed.

Final message

More from SOS Allergo

Asthma · Rhinitis and rhinoconjunctivitis · Eczema and contact dermatitis · Laboratory tests in allergology · Skin prick tests / patch tests · Occupational allergy · Anaphylaxis

References and resources
  • Jeebhay MF, Moscato G, Bang BE, et al. Food processing and occupational respiratory allergy - an EAACI position paper. Allergy. 2019;74(10):1852-1871. doi:10.1111/all.13807.
  • Vandenplas O, Doyen V, Raulf M. Occupational Respiratory Allergy to Flour in the Modern Era. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2025;25(1):22. doi:10.1007/s11882-025-01204-x.
  • Barbaud A, et al. Occupational protein contact dermatitis. Eur J Dermatol. 2015;25:527-534.
  • Barbaud A. Mechanism and diagnosis of protein contact dermatitis. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020;20:117-121.
  • INRS. Dermatite de contact aux protéines, TA 102 ; Tableaux RG 66, RG 65 et RG 63 des maladies professionnelles.
  • INRS. Prévention des risques en boulangerie-pâtisserie : réduction des poussières de farine et organisation du travail.

This information sheet does not replace medical consultation or assessment by the occupational physician. Investigations, prevention and occupational procedures must be tailored to the individual situation.

Scientific review: September 2026 · sosallergo.fr

Back to the library